[CentOS] fedora lifespan
Akemi Yagi
amyagi at gmail.comSun May 6 15:59:41 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] fedora lifespan
- Next message: [CentOS] fedora lifespan
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/6/07, Ross S. W. Walker <rwalker at medallion.com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > I find Fedora makes an excellent desktop OS as most people like the > latest and greatest on their desktops and are willing to deal with a > major upgrade every 18 months to get it. > > I like CentOS on my servers. Redhat compatibility gives wide third > party support and the extended lifetime makes sure I do not have to > perform a major upgrade on those every 18 months. > > Having both Fedora and CentOS in my environment means there is a common > base compatibility between the two. > > -Ross I guess this is the typical case for many users including myself. Note, though, that Fedora's lifespan is more like 13 months. Akemi
- Previous message: [CentOS] fedora lifespan
- Next message: [CentOS] fedora lifespan
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list