[CentOS] A question about RAID and partitions
Scott Moseman
scmoseman at gmail.comWed May 23 16:40:08 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] A question about RAID and partitions
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: A question about RAID and partitions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/23/07, Brent L. Bates <blbates at vigyan.com> wrote: > > I've found over the years any more partitioning than that is just > a waste of disk space. If I had more partitions, I usually ended > up with one partition with a lot of excess space and others with > not enough. It was just easier to have everything together. > Ditto from my experience. I have had problems with *lack* of space in a partition (not lack of physical drive space) way more often than I have had partitions filling up with evil, wasteful data. I have employed single partitions systems for awhile now, using a good NMS package to monitor, graph and alarm on disk space utilization. The only partitions that I have been known to still break apart are the /var/mysql and sometimes /home, but only because they are often on their own RAID arrays for ease of expansion. Thanks, Scott
- Previous message: [CentOS] A question about RAID and partitions
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: A question about RAID and partitions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list