[CentOS] A question about RAID and partitions
Daniel de Kok
danieldk at pobox.comWed May 23 17:13:00 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: A question about RAID and partitions
- Next message: [CentOS] A question about RAID and partitions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:56 -0400, Brent L. Bates wrote: > I've found over the years any more partitioning than that is just a waste > of disk space. If I had more partitions, I usually ended up with one > partition with a lot of excess space and others with not enough. It was just > easier to have everything together. On the current system we have about 600GB > of disk space available with only 5% of it used. I'm not worried about > anything getting filled up any time soon. There are good reasons for having more filesystems on a multi-user system, e.g. for setting noexec, nodev, nosuid, or a combination thereof for filesystems that users have write access too. A good reason for having /home, /tmp, and /var/tmp on a separate filesystem, is that it will not block users from creating hardlinks to system binaries. Leaving open that gap will allow them to keep vulnerable binaries around, even if you have upgraded their packages. -- Daniel
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: A question about RAID and partitions
- Next message: [CentOS] A question about RAID and partitions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list