Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> I don't see how, regardless of what the Sun agreement says, you could
>> be held any more or less responsible for redistributing java than any
>> other software component you redistribute. That is, someone would
>> have to successfully sue over damages from a software flaw first and
>> if people could do that, Microsoft would have been out of business
>> many years ago. And it is bound to be less buggy than the version you
>> do distribute...
>>
>> Anyway, according the the link I posted (which I can't check myself),
>> you can now use RHEL up2date to get sun java, so Red Hat must have
>> worked something out too.
>
>
> Scientific Linux 4.x comes with sun java too.
Are the repositories compatible?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com