The compile with the altered %prep section but that does NOT include the altered config file finished with no apparent errors. What is the next step? Thanks, David On Tuesday 22 May 2007 11:52 pm, dcw wrote: > I was changing the config as well. If I reinstall the src rpm and edit > the %prep section only, as you detailed, then the error: > non-existent symbol PHYSICAL_START > is only a warning. The rpmbuild -ba is running now. > > It is when I altered the config file that it fails. > > This leads me to believe that I have not enabled enough ISA settings in the > config file for everything to work correctly. I saw no comments in xconfig > indicating that other settings should be altered. > > I am pressing 'y' for isapnp and isa support. Are both needed for ne2000 > support? > > I am pressing 'm' for ne2000 support. > > Any idea which additional ISA or other settings I should set? > > Thanks, > > David > > On Tuesday 22 May 2007 11:32 am, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On 5/22/07, dcw <dwoody1 at charter.net> wrote: > > > I deleted the contents of /home/cs/redhat. I then did a install of the > > > 8.1.4 src. > > > I edited the SPEC file so that the %prep section started as follows: > > > > > > %prep > > > # First we unpack the kernel tarball. > > > > > > Then I did the rpmbuild -bp and got the same failure: > > > non-existent symbol PHYSICAL_START > > > > My procedure is exactly the same as yours. It's not a warning? The > > command actually fails? > > > > Akemi > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos