Bob Chiodini wrote: > Maybe it's his email provider dropping the In-Reply-To header item. His > email header did have a References tag. Yes. In a broken format (without the <> around those) and it is referencing his first posting. > BTW: Looking at the Mutt manual: Mutt should use either "In-Reply-To" > or "References" if "strict_threads" is set to yes. Which doesn't repair this :( Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070524/48c88ff1/attachment-0004.sig>