Les Mikesell wrote: > > I don't see how, regardless of what the Sun agreement says, you could be > held any more or less responsible for redistributing java than any > other software component you redistribute. That is, someone would have > to successfully sue over damages from a software flaw first and if > people could do that, Microsoft would have been out of business many > years ago. And it is bound to be less buggy than the version you do > distribute... > > Anyway, according the the link I posted (which I can't check myself), > you can now use RHEL up2date to get sun java, so Red Hat must have > worked something out too. Scientific Linux 4.x comes with sun java too.