Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > Hey look at me! I'm top-posting!!! Nanny-nanny-poo-poo > > Come get me Trolls! Please do not top post. :) > SATA drives typically do 60-70MBs, interleaved you > should see 120-140MB/s on sequential. Random IO on SATA > usually sucks too badly to even talk about... Eh? It cannot be worse than PATA drives now can it?