[CentOS] CentOS 5.0: Xen vs OpenVZ

Thu May 10 10:29:01 UTC 2007
Roberto Pereyra <pereyra.roberto at gmail.com>

2007/5/10, Daniel de Kok <danieldk at pobox.com>:
> On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 11:23 +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> > Also is very easy to migrate one virtual machine to a server to another
> > for maintenance/reboots.
>
> (Live) migration is also possible with Xen.
>
> > What I don't like of Xen is the slow restart and the disk management
> > (either dedicated partition or image file) which can lead to slower
> > backup and harder migration; instead I'm attracted by the standard and
> > fully supported kernel.
> >
> > Does anyone have experience on Xen and have advice on which could be the
> > best compromise between the two solutions? Of course with Xen I have to
> > start all over on learning but... hey I'm a Linux fan, I like to learn!
>
> An additional advantage of Xen is that it works with SELinux without
> much hassle.
>
> -- Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


Hi

Here:

http://forum.lxlabs.com/index.php?t=msg&th=374&start=0&

discuss on this subject.

Roberto







-- 
Ing. Roberto Pereyra
ContenidosOnline
http://www.contenidosonline.com.ar