Ok, thanks. After you mentioned it, I checked out the website and it looked very promising. But I guess I'll stay away. Thanks Matt On 5/10/07, Tim Uckun <timuckun at gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/10/07, Matt Shields <mattboston at gmail.com> wrote: > > Were you able to get this working? After seeing your email about > > this, it looks like something I could use. > > > As I said I got it kind of working. Some clients are able to log in, > some are not. Some log files nothing but spaces other's don't really > say anything useful. They give microsoft type of error messages like > "object reference not set" or some such crap. > > My advice is not to bother it's just not worth your headache. I am > stuck with my install because I have some users on it they have lots > of data but I curse the day I chose to install this thing. > > Furthermore there is no community to ask for help. The developers > don't answer questions, if you are really really lucky they will ask > you for some logs or config files and then completely ignore you after > that. > > Maybe one day when 3.6 finally becomes stable it will be worth looking > at but that project is at least a year behind now. They promised an > interim 3.5 stable release and that never materialized either, they > rushed out a "developer release" but it's buggy as hell. > > Take my advice stay far away from this project. Use rsync, use unison, > use powerfolders, use scp, use subversion use anything else but this > thing. > > you have been warned. I have spent countless hours trying to get this > thing working properly and it never had learn from my hard earned > experience. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >