if you only have two drives concurrent access is guaranteed. Miguel Medalha wrote: > >> have raid 0 and raid1 on the same drive isn't going to gie you anything >> since the raid 1 will "slow" the other raids down. >> > > You are assuming that both arrays will always be concurrently accessed > but that may not be the case. > More yet: the configuration may have been studied in such a way that > concurrent access is rarely the case. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Scanned with Copfilter Version 0.84beta2 (P3Scan 2.2.1) > AntiSpam: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 > AntiVirus: ClamAV 0.90.2/3282 - Tue May 22 10:56:04 2007 > by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org > -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape" CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician) Linux user #322099 Machines: 206822 256638 276825 http://counter.li.org/