Wei Yu wrote:
> I see.
> In summary, PAM is still difficult for using two passwords for two
> different
> ways, right?
> I will try to read more about PAM to see if so.
> Thanks.
It isn't that you can't use it that way but there isn't much point. The
idea is for PAM to provide a common way to configure multiple services
to use the same method(s). If you are configure one service to use one
different method that the service can do directly, PAM is just an
unnecessary layer.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com