On 5/29/07, Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > Mark Hull-Richter wrote: > > On 5/29/07, Robert Nichols > > <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > >> > >> Yes. It appears that you added the extension in two places: the spec > >> file, > >> and the config file. Just add the extension in the spec file. Adding it > >> in the config file causes confusion in the build process. > >> > > > > Okay, but (which, I supposed, means "not REALLY okay..." :-) according > > to the wiki, and every build I did under 4.4, when building a kernel > > we are guided to change the "Local version" in the config file (via > > make menuconfig or whatever) and also to change the "release" in the > > spec file - both. > > > > Is this no longer true in 5.0/2.6.18? If so, it's certainly a minor > > convenience, but I haven't seen that documented anywhere yet (or did I > > miss it?). > > All I can say is that I changed the spec file only, and my kernel came > out just fine (running version 2.6.18-8.1.4.1.rkn right now). > It certainly looks that way to me, too. Thanks. -- Mark Hull-Richter DATAllegro (www.datallegro.com) 85 Enterprise, 2nd Floor, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Ofc: 949-680-3082 fax: 949-680-3001