[CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
Ross S. W. Walker
rwalker at medallion.comFri Nov 30 21:12:30 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
- Next message: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John R Pierce wrote: > > Matt Shields wrote: > > Dump the cluste suite and use the LinuxVirtualServer.org packages. > > isn't that heartbeat and stuff repackaged? Visiting the web site it appears to be a load-balancer, not that that wouldn't be useful in some scenarios, but it isn't really "clustering" software that is to have an application run in active/passive or active/active between multiple nodes cooperatively, with fencing and shared storage, locking and all that goes with that. -Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
- Next message: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list