[CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
Amos Shapira
amos.shapira at gmail.comFri Nov 30 23:11:55 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
- Next message: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields <mattboston at gmail.com> wrote: > Yup. We use LVS for all types of failover senarios. We use it for > redundant firewall/vpn servers which use heartbeat for failing over So you are using the same heartbeat that doesn't work for me? Or are you refering to another package which provides a similar functionality? > the virtual IPs and services. We also use LVS with ldirectord as > redundant load balancers. Read the docs, they explain how to set up a > service to be started/stopped on failover I've been digging the web for over a week now but it just doesn't work the way it's supposed to, whatever I try. Any other hints? Thanks, --Amos
- Previous message: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
- Next message: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list