[CentOS] atmail & centos

Fri Nov 2 17:18:38 UTC 2007
Hiep Nguyen <hiep at ee.ucr.edu>

On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, ethericalzen at gmail.com wrote:

> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Hiep Nguyen <hiep at ee.ucr.edu> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled:
>
>> hi friends,
>>
>> i'm researching to see if i can run my own email server on
>> centos.  i'm looking at qmail & centos, but the problem that i
>> have is it doesn't have the web interface that can similar with
>> outlook. our users don't like squirrelmail, or NOCC, or horde
>> interfaces) however, i found atmail.com and it seems to have what
>> i'm looking for b/c it's kindda integrate with outlook (i don't
>> know how good it is)
>>
>> does any one here have any thoughts/suggestions about atmail on
>> centos 5? or is there anything like atmail out there that i can
>> use to run email server on centos 5.
>>
>> thank you for any helps.
>> T. Hiep
>
> Are you not wanting your users to check their mail with their own
> client? It seems like you're wanting to provide a web interface,
> which isn't necessary really. You can simply allow your users to
> check their mail via outlook or thunderbird or whatever.
>
> Are you attempting to use calendaring or something? Otherwise, I
> run my own mail server for certain individuals with spamassassin
> and I do not use squirrelmail; although, I might there just hasn't
> been a need for me to set it up yet.
>
> Sincerely
> -- 
> ethericalzen at gmail.com
> Life is a prison, death is a release
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

i'm the one who maintain their email client, so i try to avoid they use 
any email client, just pure web interface will be nice, they also like to 
be notified when a new email arrived.

there are other reasons that email client is not practical for us.

T. Hiep