On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Dag Wieers wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > > > Ern jura wrote: > > > > > > > I get the following error when I try installing fuse-ntfs-3g even > > > > though I have installed fuse-2.7 and fuse-kmdl-2.7 > > > > > > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > > libfuse.so.2 is needed by fuse-ntfs-3g-1.913-1.el5.rf.i386 > > > > libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.2) is needed by > > > > fuse-ntfs-3g-1.913-1.el5.rf.i386 > > > > libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.5) is needed by > > > > fuse-ntfs-3g-1.913-1.el5.rf.i386 > > > > libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.6) is needed by > > > > fuse-ntfs-3g-1.913-1.el5.rf.i386 > > > are you mixing repos here? > > > > > > in rpmforge libfuse is in package fuse I think, and there's no fuse-kmdl > > > but > > > there's a dkms-fuse > > > > I added obsoletes and provides for libfuse now as well. (I already had > > them for fuse-libs) > > > > Thanks for reporting ! > > I don't get it Dag, your fuse package already provided libfuse, no? > > $ rpm -q fuse --provides > config(fuse) = 2.7.0-1.el5.rf > fuse-libs = 2.7.0-1.el5.rf > libfuse.so.2()(64bit) > libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.2)(64bit) > libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.4)(64bit) > libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.5)(64bit) > libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.6)(64bit) > libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.7)(64bit) > libulockmgr.so.1()(64bit) > fuse = 2.7.0-1.el5.rf > > > The OP seemed to have a different fuse package (Axel's I guess) I now provide and obsolete 'libfuse' in the RPM namespace (much like you can see above for 'fuse-libs'). That should mitigate the problem reported before. -- -- dag wieers, dag at centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]