Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > > On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt <[1]ra+centos at br-online.de > wrote: > > Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > > > > Hi, > > Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to > bind > > bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a security hole. > Which one which isn't fixed in bind-9.2.4-27.0.1.el4? > > Thanks for your quick respone. > pls see below URL. > [2]http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5366 [admin at juwel ~]$ rpm -q --changelog bind-libs|grep CVE - fixed cryptographically weak query id generator (CVE-2007-2926) So that has been fixed, as you have been told on Jul 25th. Why bring that up again? And please refrain from answering to the list *and* to me. I read this list and answer here. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071022/eb89bca7/attachment-0005.sig>