[CentOS] [Fwd: Re: rpm spec files for ruby]
James B. Byrne
byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca
Tue Sep 11 17:42:01 UTC 2007
On Tue, September 11, 2007 12:58, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Is my understanding of this correct or in what matter is it defective?
Evidently defective. I have found another reference that describes
So the unqualified %files directive is for the base package and the
qualified ones are for the sub-packages. Is this correct?
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
More information about the CentOS