[CentOS] Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
Mark D. Foster
mark at foster.ccSun Sep 9 04:23:40 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Next message: [CentOS] Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bart Schaefer wrote: > On 9/8/07, Barry Brimer <lists at brimer.org> wrote: > >> Have you checked speed and duplex settings? >> > > All NICs on all machines involved report exactly the same: > > negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok > > We've also checked ifconfig on all interfaces, and no errors, dropped > packets, overruns, nor collisions have been recorded. > You might try *not* auto-negotiating as described here: http://mark.foster.cc/wiki/index.php/Ethtool -- Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.' Mark D. Foster, CISSP <mark at foster.cc> http://mark.foster.cc/
- Previous message: [CentOS] Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Next message: [CentOS] Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list