[CentOS] hardware raid vs fake raid
Tim Verhoeven
tim.verhoeven.be at gmail.comThu Sep 13 07:00:48 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] hardware raid vs fake raid
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: hardware raid vs fake raid
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/13/07, Tom Diehl <tdiehl at rogueind.com> wrote: > > Does anyone know how I can find out if an ibm serveraid 8k sas storage > controller (zero channel RAID) is a real hardware RAID controller and > supported in the standard CentOs kernel or is it a fake raid controller. > I am trying to decide if I should get the serveraid controller or go get > a 3ware controller. Tom, The ServeRAID 8k s a real hardware raid controller, is has 256 MB of cache I think and a battery backup. So in this case there is no need for a 3ware controller. On the IBM website you can also find a commandline tool (called arcconf) that allows you monitor and configure the controller inside Linux. Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - dj at rootshell.be - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the "microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds)
- Previous message: [CentOS] hardware raid vs fake raid
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: hardware raid vs fake raid
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list