Brian Mathis wrote: > On 9/20/07, gjgowey at tmo.blackberry.net <gjgowey at tmo.blackberry.net> wrote: >> That or run buzzsaw (win) which is a continuous defragmenter (well, >> when the system is idle that is) that runs in the background and only >> costs $10. Pagedefrag from sysinternals doesn't hurt either (and it's free >> off ms' website). And no, I'm not affiliated with either I just like the >> products. >> >> Geoff > > On 9/21/07, William Warren <hescominsoon at emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com> wrote: >> IME defragging is highly needed in busy servers that use a lot of disk. >> Every single one of my clients have seen server performance tank when >> fragmentation goes over 15% or so..including the workstations. In vista >> it's still necessary. >> > > Last I checked, CentOS was Linux? thank you. I'm glad someone said it cause I was starting to wonder what list I was reading. In answer to "what's the difference between NTFS and ext2/3?" Friggin night and day brother! Night and DAY. But I digress. I think what is needed here is a tried and true RTFM. That is the response I was expecting would find it's way into this thread, but I've not yet seen it. Maybe further down the thread perhaps. :) -- Mark "If you have found a very wise man, then you've found a man that at one time was an idiot and lived long enough to learn from his own stupidity." ============================================== Powered by CentOS4 (RHEL4)