I mistyped..hardware raid is the way to go. FRIAD will perform worse than Linux software raid most times..:) Feizhou wrote: > William Warren wrote: >> actually it'll perform WORSE in many cases than Linux software raid. > > Used to (bar buggy firmware, incompatibilities). Most hardware raid > cards nowadays not only have sufficient processing power, they also come > with decent sizes of RAM cache which helps swing things a lot in their > favour. > > If the load goes beyond what the card can handle, then yes, Linux > software raid is the way to go. > >> >> Scott Silva wrote: >>> gjgowey at tmo.blackberry.net spake the following on 9/21/2007 2:43 AM: >>>> Exactly how much throughput are you realistically anticipating? >>>> What connection are you going to use? 802.11 or 10/100 or gige? >>>> And yes, the chips will pretty much always give you better >>>> performance with raid. >>> >>> Hardware raid gives better performance. Both of those are >>> "fakeraid".It won't perform any better than software raid. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape" CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician) Linux user #322099 Machines: 206822 256638 276825 http://counter.li.org/