[CentOS] Interface bonding?
Timothy Selivanow
timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.comFri Apr 11 19:33:48 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Interface bonding?
- Next message: [CentOS] Interface bonding?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > > >> If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! > > >> > > > > > > They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a > > > small 24 port switch. We've got stacks of these sitting unused, so I > > > doubt they're too expensive/valuable. > > > > > > > They were expensive once. Now they are end-of-life'd and you can't get > > a support contract or a new IOS for them. > > > > Yea there 8years old and do not support todays technology. All the way > back to IOS 8.. It's running IOS 12.0(5)WC16, but running that command in enable didn't work (also tried it in config). Thanks for all of your suggestions and help. It's still pretty frustrating though... --Tim ____________________________ / "All Bibles are man-made." \ \ -- Thomas Edison / ---------------------------- \ \ \ \ /\ ( ) .( o ).
- Previous message: [CentOS] Interface bonding?
- Next message: [CentOS] Interface bonding?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list