on 4-18-2008 1:38 AM Fajar Priyanto spake the following: > Hello all, > I have a customer that insists of using upstream vendor's diskless > (system-config-netboot) rather than LTSP. The reason is that he wants to use > a 100% packages from the vendor, not from LTSP or any other party. > > I try the vendor's diskless system, and although it's very simple to setup, it > lacks the support and/or documentation whereas LTSP is very good in it. > Another sample is that he wants to connect a scanner to the client, I doubt it > can be, since there's no documentation about it at all from the vendor. > > Is there any fundamental difference between the two setups? > Thank you. > The big difference is that the LTSP package was set up to overcome the limitations of the pure upstream version. Have a look at K12ltsp.org. They have a version based on Centos-5. Maybe it will fill your need. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080418/c380c7af/attachment-0005.sig>