Oh, sorry....I should have explained. In this initial testing (before getting VPN involved) there is no internal/external only two adapters that are "bonded":
bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0D:60:19:7A:9A
inet addr:10.2.0.99 Bcast:10.2.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20d:60ff:fe19:7a9a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:880123407 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1270747604 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:3821604891 (3.5 GiB) TX bytes:2078971129 (1.9 GiB)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0D:60:19:7A:9A
inet6 addr: fe80::20d:60ff:fe19:7a9a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:761346542 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1015302673 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:4088400437 (3.8 GiB) TX bytes:2764744216 (2.5 GiB)
Base address:0x2500 Memory:f8fe0000-f9000000
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0D:60:19:7A:9B
inet6 addr: fe80::20d:60ff:fe19:7a9b/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:118776865 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:255444931 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:4028171750 (3.7 GiB) TX bytes:3609194209 (3.3 GiB)
Base address:0x2540 Memory:f8fc0000-f8fe0000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:4910413 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:4910413 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:908267443 (866.1 MiB) TX bytes:908267443 (866.1 MiB)
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE & RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acres Dr. Fax: (254)741-5777
Waco, Texas 76710
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Vahur Jõesalu
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:28 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] TCP/IP Port Relay
to clarify. your rules that you entered were (I am replacing
it-304.ailife.com here with 10.1.1.1, and external_interface with eth0,
and internal_interface with eth1 - for claritys sake):
/sbin/iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 23 -j DNAT \
--to 10.1.9.2:3270
/sbin/iptables -I FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 \
-p tcp -d 10.1.9.2 --dport 3270 -j ACCEPT
this is normal port forward on linux box. you are forwarding linux box
external port 23 to internal server port 3270. Is this what you want?
You would need to connect to linux box external IP to port 23 from the
10.1.1.1 machine. You could change the forward rule to allow inbound
traffic just from 10.1.1.1 (that's the host on the very left in your
original chart):
/sbin/iptables -I FORWARD -s 10.1.1.1 -i eth0 -o eth1 \
-p tcp -d 10.1.9.2 --dport 3270 -j ACCEPT
the simplest way to test if port forwarding works is to telnet to port
23 on 10.1.9.2:
telnet 10.1.9.2 23 # actually 23 is redundant, since it's the default
port of telnet anyway.
you should see something like this, indicating successful connection
(assuming 10.1.1.1 is linux box):
Trying 10.1.9.2...
Connected to 10.1.9.2.
Escape character is '^]'.
if you get that, then port forwarding works.
if port forwarding is not what you need, then please explain in a little
more detail
-vahur
Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
> There seems to be a problem with it
>
> Normal (TN3270 traffic originating from the relay host):
>
> 10:44:29.667165 IP doylebrunson.ailife.com.46318 > 10.1.9.2.verismart: S 707994026:707994026(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 1913051656 0,nop,wscale 7>
> 10:44:29.685075 IP 10.1.9.2.verismart > doylebrunson.ailife.com.46318: S 1665830401:1665830401(0) ack 707994027 win 33396 <mss 1452,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 6736695 1913051656>
> 10:44:29.685137 IP doylebrunson.ailife.com.46318 > 10.1.9.2.verismart: . ack 1 win 46 <nop,nop,timestamp 1913051674 6736695>
> 10:44:29.707089 IP 10.1.9.2.verismart > doylebrunson.ailife.com.46318: P 1:4(3) ack 1 win 33396 <nop,nop,timestamp 6736695 1913051656>
> 10:44:29.707147 IP doylebrunson.ailife.com.46318 > 10.1.9.2.verismart: . ack 4 win 46 <nop,nop,timestamp 1913051696 6736695>
>
> Relayed:
>
> 10:44:04.362686 IP it-304.ailife.com.bts-appserver > 10.1.9.2.verismart: S 3483673038:3483673038(0) win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
> 10:44:07.294923 IP it-304.ailife.com.bts-appserver > 10.1.9.2.verismart: S 3483673038:3483673038(0) win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
>
> ...and the client times out (The TN3270 server is running on port 3270/verismart).
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
> Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
> Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE & RHCE
> American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649
> 1200 Wooded Acres Dr. Fax: (254)741-5777
> Waco, Texas 76710
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Vahur Jõesalu
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] TCP/IP Port Relay
>
> hmm, if I understood you correctly, then this should work just fine (on
> linux firewall):
>
> /sbin/iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 23 -j DNAT \
> --to telnetserverip:port-number
> /sbin/iptables -I FORWARD -i external_interface -o internal_interface \
> -p tcp -d telnetserverip --dport portnumberontelnetserver -j ACCEPT
>
> after a reboot or firewall service restart it's gone again.
>
> -vahur
>
> Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
>> What is the best way to temporarily setup a port relay. I'm trying to
>> diagnose a problem with Cisco's latest VPN client and need to determine
>> if the problem is port number related.
>>
>> e.g. VPN client---------23-(Linux box to relay port)-------xx-(Telnet
>> server)
>>
>> (Keep in mind this is temporary and for debugging purposes)
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> _____________________________________________________
>
> This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the
>
> intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure,
>
> copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
>
> received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at PrivacyAct at ailife.com.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_____________________________________________________
This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at PrivacyAct at ailife.com.