[CentOS] Win2000 / Win2003 ADS dnsHostName and servicePrincipalName
rob.townley at gmail.com
Mon Aug 18 22:47:02 UTC 2008
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:50 PM, David Miller <dmiller at ccim.us> wrote:
> We've had good luck with this approach:
> Basically using the Windows 2003 R2 schema extensions (as opposed to SFU)
> and Identity Management for Unix mmc.
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:17 PM, BlackHand <
> yonsy at blackhandchronicles.homeip.net> wrote:
>> nate wrote:
>>> Rob Townley wrote:
>>> Over the weekend i gave up on CentOS and tried Fedora because Fedora
>>>> repositories have SaMBa 3.2, but CentOS only has 3.0. SaMBa 3.2
>>>> sasl sign and seal (hashing and encryption) and supports NTLMv2 better
>>>> using winbind with ADS.
>>> Rebuild the samba src rpms on CentOS?
>>> I gave up on integrating windows+(insert any OS here) integration years
>>> not worth the headaches.
>> less headaches
>> use Services For Unix in your AD.
>> if you need winbind, use the samba rpms from Sernet.
>> almost all my nightmares with integrations with AD+winbind was resolved
>> with this ones.
>> Black Hand
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS at centos.org
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
i forgot about EnterpriseSamba - thanks for the link. Maybe i wont compile
on CentOS because EnterpriseSamba has a repository now - *
http://ftp.sernet.de *for Yum, debs, and YaST. Fedora seems to be working
fairly well, but i won't really trust it until i have put it thru about 2
months of use.
Scott Lowe also has an article on Win2003R1. (A license to Win2003R1 does
not give you a license to Win2003R2 - It has to be purchased.) There are so
many more comments and user experiences on his blog now - thanks for the
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CentOS