[CentOS] Re: CentOS Mailing list on nabble . why not ??
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.comThu Aug 28 21:36:11 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS Mailing list on nabble . why not ??
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS Mailing list on nabble . why not ??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
on 8-28-2008 4:26 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> Ralph Angenendt wrote: >>>> Ah okay, it's something like gmane.org without the NNTP interface. Yes, >>>> I think we could do that if noone else has anything against that. >>> or just tell people to use gmane :D >> Well, I see no harm in doing both ... > > We can make it read-only on there >:) - but then it's just another > archive. > And maybe another spam entry point! Isn't the list writable to members only? I can't remember anymore. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080828/a6f498f2/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS Mailing list on nabble . why not ??
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS Mailing list on nabble . why not ??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list