On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:12 AM, MHR <mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I remember running into this a while back. That being the case, >>> shouldn't unifdef be included in kernel-devel, or at least one of the >>> packages that are required for building a kernel? Seems like it >>> sticks out like a sore thumb this way.... >>> >>> Alternatively, how do I go about suggesting this in a formal way >>> (bugzilla, etc.)? >> >> Alan and I are now talking about this so we can amend the Wiki article >> appropriately. According to him, unifdef is not required on his >> 32-bit system. I will update on this subject as soon as I gather more >> info. > > Many thanks! Let me know if I can help. You can certainly help. So, from what you wrote I suppose you encountered the same dependency problem and then manually installed unifdef. Was this indeed the case? Also, this happened on an x86_64 system? Akemi