On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>wrote: > Jeff Kinz wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:04:21PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: >> >> >>> Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel >>> between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? >>> >>> >> >> In addition the rest of the good info others already posted for you, >> please remember that "128 bit encryption" doesn't mean anything unless you >> also specify the encryption scheme being used. >> >> A 128 bit encryption scheme may or may not be easily broken depending on >> which one it is. (Pick a good!) >> > Actually 'we' (crypto community) talk about crypto-suites, as you have to > look at all the pieces involved. If everything is not disclosed (like with > Skype), then you just don't know where the weakness may be. > > SSH, IPsec (watch out for the 'Null' cipher :) ), TLS (some of the suites > are too weak to talk about), and HIP are all well-rounded security > protocols. I have worked on all of them. > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > i would look into the HIP stuff. But also look at the Hamachi like solutions such as EOIP - Ethernet Over IP (built into dd-wrt) and tinc-vpn. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080827/76e39911/attachment-0005.html>