On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Spiro Harvey wrote: > I'm still curious about the discrepencies in the version numbers, does > yours come up with conflicting numbers on the splash screen? I can only confirm that you are right on that one as well :-) Also true for RHEL BTW. >From the vi --debug output it seems obvious that vi reports the highest included patch in the version. So what I think happened is that Red Hat started off from 7.0.109 and added patches upto 237. Still confusing though. -- -- dag wieers, dag at centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]