[CentOS] Re: Backport uncertainty
Joseph L. Casale
jcasale at ActiveNetwerx.comWed Feb 13 20:26:32 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Backport uncertainty
- Next message: [CentOS] Backport uncertainty
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>Instead of downloading the srpm why not just run rpm -q --changelog postfix | less and read that? Nice, it looks like it's not backported. I looked at an rpm I _know_ is backported (xen 303) and it's easy to grep for the possibility as they call it out! I guess I don't have Postfix 2.4x :( Thank you everyone! jlc
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Backport uncertainty
- Next message: [CentOS] Backport uncertainty
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list