On Feb 19, 2008 3:30 AM, Ed Donahue <liberaled at gmail.com> wrote: > > repo id repo name status priority > ======= ========= ====== ======== > extras CentOS-5 - Extras enabled 1 > base CentOS-5 - Base enabled 1 > addons CentOS-5 - Addons enabled 1 > c5-media CentOS-5 - Media disabled 2 > centosplus CentOS-5 - Plus disabled 2 > adobe-linux-i38 Adobe Systems Incorporated enabled 11 > kbs-CentOS-Extr CentOS.Karan.Org-EL5 - Stable enabled 12 > rpmforge Red Hat Enterprise 5 - RPMforge.net enabled 15 > > updates CentOS-5 - Updates enabled 99 > c5-testing CentOS-5 Testing disabled 99 > > I'm guessing updates should be priority 1 instead of 99? Yes, updates should be set to 1. Akemi