Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > > RH 5 doesn't have Xemacs? > > Why not? Because Linux is a perfectly good operating system already without layering Emacs on top of it.
Sat Feb 2 03:38:40 UTC 2008
Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com>
Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > > RH 5 doesn't have Xemacs? > > Why not? Because Linux is a perfectly good operating system already without layering Emacs on top of it.