Dago Pacheco wrote: > Johnny Hughes escribió: >> Dago Pacheco wrote: >>> Ralph Angenendt escribió: >>>> Dago Pacheco wrote: >>>>> Hi.... I have this CentOS 4.3 server that is used as a file, web >>>>> and mail server just for LAN hosts. After an up2date procedure (in >>>>> wich there was a lot of package involved.... about 500) I started >>>>> having problems with file shareing in samba server. >>>> >>>> As the Release Notes state (you did read those, didn't you?): >>>> >>>> samba >>>> >>>> samba has been updated to version 3.0.25b. This addresses several >>>> critical issues affecting interoperability with Windows 2003™ and >>>> Windows Vista™ (resolved in recent upstream releases). >>>> >>>> All revisions to samba made for this update entailed invasive >>>> code changes in some critical code paths. This made backporting >>>> to version 3.0.10 non-feasible. As such, all samba packages were >>>> rebased to version 3.0.25b instead. >>>> >>>> Because of the rebase, some option interpretation methods >>>> and components behaviors changed significantly. This means >>>> that after upgrading samba, the configuration file will need >>>> to be manually edited. >>>> >>>> More details in those release notes. >> >>> But I just have Win2K users...... I'll check those release notes >> >> Right, however the Vista and 2003 server thing is the reason for doing >> the changes in that way (rebasing and not backporting). >> >> Once rebasing decision is made (not my decision ... made upstream :_) >> ), all config files need to be re-evaluated and changed as necessary, >> regardless of the clients involved, as there are different options ... >> some added, some removed, etc. >> >> run this command: >> >> testparm >> >> Also you may want to look here: >> >> http://samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.0.25b.html >> >> Also follow the links to 3.0.25a, 3.0.25 to see what items should >> change (in the config file) on an upgrade from 3.0.10 TO 3.0.25b. >> >> The bottom line is that your config file may need some work to >> function properly, and what you potentially need to change totally >> depends on what you currently have in your smb.conf file. >> >> Thanks, >> Johnny Hughes >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > ok... I'll try to reconfig samba, but by the way... is there any chance > to get back to the previous version? > sure, you can reinstall it manually and remove it from yum updates in the future however, that is not recommended -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080212/0a0b1a64/attachment-0005.sig>