Bob Taylor wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 19:56 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: >> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 15:37 -0800, Bob Taylor wrote: >>> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:41 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Bob Taylor <bob8221 at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> <snip> >>> <snip> > > [snip] > >> Priority *and* protect? Supposed to be a no-no. >> >> Worse, it's on the updates too. I would carefully examine all your repo >> defs and have *either* protect or priority, but not both. Also make sure >> the settings are appropriate sionce you've add some other repos. > > Thanks for your response, Bill. I added the protect lines attempting to > locate this problem. I've removed all protect lines. > >> I've been using Rpmforge for a long time, NP. But at the time I >> established priorities, I disabled all protect settings. >> >> And there are a couple exclude and include setups for a few special >> instances. > > Mind telling me what these are? > "protect=N" is part of the protectbase plugin. You do not want to install the protectbase and priorities plugins on the same machine. Looking at your output of yum-\* you do not seem to have yum-protectbase installed, so the settings by themselves should not matter. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080223/f34b982f/attachment-0005.sig>