William L. Maltby wrote: > I don't know if I'm brain damaged this A.M. or what, but I can't figure > (recall?) why this summary says CentOS 5 in the "Today's Topics", has > "el5" and "centos.3" as well in the md5sum. > > Gentle chides for being dense this morning are accepted. Hmm? I don't really understand your question. Old version was 2.2.3-6.el5.centos.1, new version is 2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 - it's just naming. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080118/92ee77a7/attachment-0004.sig>