Jim Perrin a écrit : > > If apache owns everything in that directory, then it can modify them. > This can potentially be undesirable. Depending on what you're doing, > you'll have to mix and match permissions as needed. Mostly apache just > needs to be able to read stuff, so having root own it with 644 is > fine. If you're using a CMS which allows folks to edit things via the > webserver, then those will have to be owned by apache, or apache will > otherwise need rights to modify them. Have I made that muddled and > complex enough? > Yes! :o) Most of the hosted stuff is indeed CMS, so I'll go for apache:apache. Cheers, Niki