On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, mouss wrote:
>Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Jerry Geis wrote:
>>> Is there a command that will monitor a process for exiting (crash or
>>> normal exit) and
>>> then execute another command based on the said process no longer being
>>> active?
>>>
>>> Or is there a "wrapper" command that runs a process and when that
>>> process exists
>>> due to crashing or just exiting normally) that another process can be
>>> run.
>>>
>>
>> Why not use a shell script as a wrapper? If you don't put something in
>> the background with an & on the line, the next line will execute when/if
>> the program started on the current line exits. There are nearly always
>> other copies of the shell running anyway so you get shared-text
>> efficiency. If you just want to keep restarting the same program,
>> something like this should run forever.
>>
>> while :
>> do
>> my_program
>> done
>>
>
>This has two issues (at least):
>- if the program is a daemon, it returns immediately, so the scrpit will
>try to start the program again and again
>- if the script gets a signal, it will be killed. back to start.
If you use ``kill -0 pid'' it shouldn't affect the running process, and
will return success ($? = 0) if the process is running, and fail otherwise.
A fairly standard way of checking things like this is:
pidfile=/var/run/progname.pid
progname_signal() {
[ -f $progname_pidfile ] && kill -$1 `cat $progname_pidfile`
}
if progname_signal 0
then
echo is running
else
echo not running
fi
Bill
--
INTERNET: bill at celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
"If taxation without consent is robbery, the United States government
has never had, has not now, and is never likely to have, a single honest
dollar in its treasury." -- Lysander Spooner, Letter to Grover Cleveland 1886