On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 11:33 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 00:27 +0100, Brian Schueler wrote: > > > I wanted to reply messages (e.g. to the cross-build-env in centos-devel) > > > but my replies get posted as a new thread. I'm using Emulution 2.8 and I > > > think Evolution eats the in-reply-to information. Is there anyone who > > > also uses Evolution (especially in conjunction with a Scalix imap > > > server)? > > > So please tell me the right settings to acting not so disturbingly. > > > > I would be *extremely* surprised if this was evolution's fault. For all > > its issues, that's one I've not seen from it. > > Oh, I've seen it quite often here on the mailing list, so it has to be > possible to bring Evolution to not write an In-Reply-To: or References: > header ... I don't doubt that messages which originated with evolution could have headers arbitrarily removed by broken or misconfigured MTAs. I also don't doubt that evolution could misinterpret existing headers when displaying threads. I simply have seen no irrefutable proof that evolution breaks threading via replies of its own accord. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed