[CentOS] Bind Firewall Rules

Johnny Hughes johnny at centos.org
Sun Jul 20 13:07:28 UTC 2008

John Hinton wrote:
> OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're 
> supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no 
> longer enough.

how do you mean?

opening port 53 in is still enough ... the outbound port is what is 

not sure what kind of problems you are encountering

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080720/895b280f/attachment.sig>

More information about the CentOS mailing list