[CentOS] Re: question regarding mx servers with same priority
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.comWed Jul 16 15:10:18 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] question regarding mx servers with same priority
- Next message: [CentOS] Test - you don't need to read it
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
on 7-16-2008 12:42 AM fabian dacunha spake the following: > Thanks guys for the immediate reply.. > > anyway based on your nice sugeestions i feel that having a mail server > with different MX records would be definately better than having 2 servers > with the same MX since i was confused about which setup to be used > > setting up 2 server with same MX > or one with higher n one with lower priority > > thnks once again > > Just remember to have adequate spam and virus scanning on the backup MX also. Because it will be hammered with most of the junk eventually. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080716/d7f32e2c/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] question regarding mx servers with same priority
- Next message: [CentOS] Test - you don't need to read it
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list