[CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?
Tony Molloy
tony.molloy at ul.ieWed Jul 23 13:53:05 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?
- Next message: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 14:31:11 Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Tony Molloy wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:53:49 +0100: > > I installed fail2ban from rpmforge and it has no dependencies. > > Ah, thanks, I thought I had installed an rpm earlier that didn't have > dependencies, but I couldn't find the machine I did it on. I disabled the > kbs repo and I'm now getting it. yum wanted to install the older i386 rpm > first, though. Does the i386 override noarch, although the version is > newer? > > > > Kai I installed on some x86_64 systems but you can specify noarch on the install line. I don't know the precedence of i386 and noarch. Tony
- Previous message: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?
- Next message: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list