Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Am 13.07.2008 um 22:14 schrieb Ryan Nichols: > >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> >>> If it works ok on the old kernel, it should also work OK on the new >>> one. >>> > > > Not if it's a binary-driver... > > >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen >>> >> ata1.00: status { DRDY } over and over >> >> No idea what i broke.. > > > > You upgraded the kernel... > > > Seriously - if this driver is not included in the vanilla- or > distribution-kernel, get the heck rid of it (the hardware). > With very few exceptions it's usually not worth the trouble. > One of these exceptions is Areca (don't know if the driver is in now > RHEL/CentOS) - the guy maintaining the driver at Areca actually > responds to email enquiries. > But then, they distribute source and not BLOBs. > > > > > cheers, > Rainer > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Thats the point Im at, but the man who pays for this hardware wants us to make this work because we already own it and it works until we attempt an upgrade of the kernel .. So i guess its onto tech support with HighPoint RocketRaid... Thanks, Ryan Nichols