to, 2008-07-17 kello 10:11 -0700, Akemi Yagi kirjoitti: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Antti J. Huhtala <ahuhtal4 at welho.com> wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > I just finished building a custom kernel from 2.6.18-53.1.21 source rpm > > - this time with ISA bus and ISAPNP support which I accidentally left > > out of my previous attempt. > > Unfortunately, this time I forgot to change my identifier in > > kernel-2.6.spec file. Thus I now have one *installed* kernel version > > *without* ISA support, and another one *with* ISA support but as rpm, > > not yet installed. Both kernels now have identical identifiers. > > > > What is the safe way to remove the previous installed kernel version > > without taking out the uninstalled new version? Is the latter safe in > > ~/rpmbuild/RPMS if I use 'rpm -e' to remove the former version? > > Hi Antti, > > I don't know if you have some reason and must stay at that old kernel, > but I advise you get the current 2.6.18-92.1.6 kernel and rebuild. > Then you'd have a chance to get your buildid in. > > Akemi Thanks, Akemi, but I first tried just that. In a post to Alan (you should have a copy of it) I told my box crashed with 2.6.18-92.1.6 (kernel panic: Not syncing). 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.bz_pre53 worked but I didn't find the source rpm until Alan told me where to find it. I have now dl'd the source rpm and will try compiling it soon. I just wanted to have one kernel with ISA support and now I have it. Building the newest kernel with ISA support should be relatively simple based on my recent experiences. Antti