John Hinton wrote: > OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're > supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no > longer enough. > how do you mean? opening port 53 in is still enough ... the outbound port is what is randomized not sure what kind of problems you are encountering -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080720/895b280f/attachment-0005.sig>