[CentOS] Re: 6TB SCSI RAID vs. Centos

Fri Jul 25 17:39:07 UTC 2008
Milt Mallory <milt at topix.net>

What SCSI controller are you using?

-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
Behalf Of Tim Nelson
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:05 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: 6TB SCSI RAID vs. Centos

I'll second that... we recently put a system online with over 3TB of
storage. The only way to create a storage medium that large was to use a
gpt disk label and use parted to do the partitioning. mkfs had no
problems formatting the partition and it's been working properly for
quite some time now.

Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Silva" <ssilva at sgvwater.com>
To: centos at centos.org
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 5:56:47 PM GMT -06:00 Guadalajara / Mexico
City / Monterrey
Subject: [CentOS] Re: 6TB SCSI RAID vs. Centos

on 7-24-2008 3:42 PM Milt Mallory spake the following:
> I have an Infortrend RAID box I'd like to see as one big 6TB
partition, 
> but I only can get 2.2TB partitions to work. I was trying to do this 
> with an Adaptec controller but apparently they are only (any of them)
48 
> bits wide. Does anybody have a working system for SCSI/Centos over
2.2TB?
> 
>
Did you try creating GPT partitions with parted? Fdisk won't do it.

-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos