YES. I forgot to mention that we have the OS on a separate 20GB RAID'ed partition. The remaining disk space is allocated to the big GPT RAID'ed partition. Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Silva" <ssilva at sgvwater.com> To: centos at centos.org Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 4:17:50 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: [CentOS] Re: 6TB SCSI RAID vs. Centos on 7-25-2008 6:26 AM Marcelo Roccasalva spake the following: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17-4+jYJfmkT58 at public.gmane.org> wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 at 6:42pm, Milt Mallory wrote >> >>> I have an Infortrend RAID box I'd like to see as one big 6TB partition, >>> but I only can get 2.2TB partitions to work. I was trying to do this >>> with an Adaptec controller but apparently they are only (any of them) 48 >>> bits wide. Does anybody have a working system for SCSI/Centos over >>> 2.2TB? >> Are you using gpt disk labels and parted (rather than fdisk) to do your >> partitioning? > > You can't install centos (or redhat) over a gpt partition (unless > itanium platform) and there is a big chance your bios won't boot such > installation. I came with 2 solutions: if disk access performance > isn't important (as for backup), I do software raid; or I install two > little raid1 disks for the OS and then I use GPT or LVM on the > multi-tera raid of big disks. > Or partition the array with a small partition for OS and big partition (gpt) for data. You should be able to carve up the array that way. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos