on 7-30-2008 9:54 PM Ian jonhson spake the following: >> It seems that you tried to patch the CentOS kernel and it didn't work. > > I am doing this experiment. And, I don't know what would happen. > Different from previous work, I don't patch the kernel from www.kernel.org > but patch the one download from www.centos.org. > > I would use the same version (kernel-2.6.18) to do patching in CentOS5. >>From the view of Scott and Johnny, I think this is proper way to accomplish > my work. > > Thanks. > > Ian That should be safer, but your best bet would be to add the patch to the bottom of the patch section of the spec file so you don't exclude the multitude of other patches there. Then cross your fingers and see if it builds clean. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080731/01ab1483/attachment-0005.sig>