[CentOS] Re: 5.1 Anaconda Install Error SOLVED
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Wed Jun 4 22:48:37 UTC 2008
on 6-4-2008 3:12 PM Kirk Bocek spake the following:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Kirk Bocek wrote:
>>> I didn't provide the details because it was strange that the
>>> installation failed at the same point regardless of the booting method I
>>> used. It felt like some basic mistake or mis-setting in the OS. But hey,
>>> I've been wrong before.
>> Anything interesting on vc#1,3,4,5 ? how about run remote syslog and see
>> if anything interesting gets in there....
> After wandering in the dark for two days, I found this posting:
> This reminded me that although this is an all SATA system, I also have a
> PATA tape drive installed.
> The solution in the posting was to temporarily unplug the tape drive.
> Rather than pull this host out of the rack for the umpteenth time, I
> simply added to the installer's command line:
> hda=none hdb=none
> For some reason, the tape drive is installed as /dev/hdb. I'm not sure
> what's at /dev/hda. If it's the DVD drive and I was installing from
> physical media, that might be a problem. However, my PXE-boot install is
> now flying along.
> Kirk Bocek
With PATA the device ID is based on location. Hdb is the primary slave (slave
on first port). There doesn't have to be a hda.
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080604/38f88243/signature.bin
More information about the CentOS